Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
2.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 5998, 2023 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783731

RESUMO

The recent monkeypox virus (MPXV) outbreak was of global concern and has mainly affected gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). Here we assess prevalence of MPXV in high-risk populations of GBMSM, trans women (TW) and non-binary people without symptoms or with unrecognized monkeypox (Mpox) symptoms, using a self-sampling strategy. Anal and pharyngeal swabs are tested by MPXV real-time PCR and positive samples are tested for cytopathic effect (CPE) in cell culture. 113 individuals participated in the study, 89 (78.76%) were cis men, 17 (15.04%) were TW. The median age was 35.0 years (IQR: 30.0-43.0), 96 (85.02%) individuals were gay or bisexual and 72 (63.72%) were migrants. Seven participants were MPXV positive (6.19% (95% CI: 1.75%-10.64%)). Five tested positive in pharyngeal swabs, one in anal swab and one in both. Six did not present symptoms recognized as MPXV infection. Three samples were positive for CPE, and showed anti-vaccinia pAb staining by FACS and confocal microscopy. This suggests that unrecognized Mpox cases can shed infectious virus. Restricting testing to individuals reporting Mpox symptoms may not be sufficient to contain outbreaks.


Assuntos
Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Espanha/epidemiologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , /epidemiologia , Vírus da Varíola dos Macacos/genética
3.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(4): 445-453, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36521505

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Monkeypox DNA has been detected in skin lesions, saliva, oropharynx, urine, semen, and stool of patients infected during the 2022 clade IIb outbreak; however, the viral dynamics within these compartments remain unknown. We aimed to characterise the viral load kinetics over time in various parts of the body. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, multicentre study of outpatients diagnosed with monkeypox in two hospitals and two sexual health clinics in Spain between June 28, 2022, and Sept 22, 2022. Men and women aged over 18 years were eligible if they reported having symptom onset within the previous 10 days of presentation, and were ineligible if disease was severe enough to be admitted to hospital. Samples were collected from five body locations (skin lesions, oropharynx, rectum, semen or vagina, and a dried blood spot) at six time points up to 57 days after the screening visit. Samples were analysed by quantitative PCR and a subset by cell culture. The primary endpoint was time from symptom onset to viral DNA clearance. FINDINGS: Overall, 1663 samples were collected from 77 study participants. 75 (97%) participants were men, the median age was 35·0 years (IQR 29·0-46·0), and 39 (51%) participants were living with HIV. The median time from symptom onset to viral clearance was 25 days (95% CI 23-28) in the skin lesions, 16 days (13-19) in the oropharynx, 16 days (13-23) in the rectum, 13 days in semen (9-18), and 1 day in blood (0-5). The time from symptom onset to viral clearance for 90% of cases was 41 days (95% CI 34-47) in skin lesions and 39 days (27-56) in semen. The median viral load in skin lesions was 7·3 log10 copies per mL (IQR 6·5-8·2) at baseline, compared with 4·6 log10 copies per mL (2·9-5·8) in oropharyngeal samples, 5·0 log10 copies per mL (2·9-7·5) in rectal samples, 3·5 log10 copies per mL (2·9-4·7) in semen samples, and 4·0 log10 copies per mL (4·0-4·0) in blood specimens. Replication-competent viruses were isolated in samples with high DNA levels (>6·5 log10 copies per mL). INTERPRETATION: In immunocompetent patients with mild monkeypox disease, PCR data alone would suggest a contact isolation period of 3 to 6 weeks but, based on detection of replication-competent virus, this time could be reduced. Based on findings from this cohort of patients, semen testing and prolonged use of condoms after recovery from monkeypox might not be necessary. FUNDING: University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol and the YoMeCorono. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Sêmen , Saliva , Carga Viral
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(7): 1311-1314, 2023 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370091

RESUMO

We evaluated the accuracy of patient-collected skin lesions, oropharyngeal, and rectal swabs among 50 individuals enrolled in a study of mpox viral dynamics. We found that the performance of self-collected samples was similar to that of physician-collected samples, suggesting that self-sampling is a reliable strategy for diagnosing mpox.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Orofaringe , Esfregaço Vaginal
5.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 21818, 2022 12 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36528712

RESUMO

Monitoring the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants is important to detect potential risks of increased transmission or disease severity. We investigated the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants from real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) routine diagnostics data. Cycle threshold (Ct) values of positive samples were collected from April 2021 to January 2022 in the Northern Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (n = 15,254). Viral lineage identification from whole genome sequencing (WGS) was available for 4618 (30.3%) of these samples. Pairwise differences in the Ct values between gene targets (ΔCt) were analyzed for variants of concern or interest circulating in our area. A specific delay in the Ct of the N-gene compared to the RdRp-gene (ΔCtNR) was observed for Alpha, Delta, Eta and Omicron. Temporal differences in ΔCtNR correlated with the dynamics of viral replacement of Alpha by Delta and of Delta by Omicron according to WGS results. Using ΔCtNR, prediction of new variants of concern at early stages of circulation was achieved with high sensitivity and specificity (91.1% and 97.8% for Delta; 98.5% and 90.8% for Omicron). Thus, tracking population-wide trends in ΔCt values obtained from routine diagnostics testing in combination with WGS could be useful for real-time management and response to local epidemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real
6.
mSphere ; 7(6): e0034622, 2022 12 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36448779

RESUMO

Limiting outbreaks in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is a cornerstone strategy to avoid an excess of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality and to reduce its burden on the health system. We studied a large outbreak that occurred at an LTCF, combining methods of classical and genomic epidemiology analysis. The outbreak lasted for 31 days among residents, with an attack rate of 98% and 57% among residents and staff, respectively. The case fatality rate among residents was 16% (n = 15). Phylogenetic analysis of 59 SARS-CoV-2 isolates revealed the presence of two closely related viral variants in all cases (B.1.177 lineage), revealing a far more complex outbreak than initially thought and suggesting an initial spread driven by staff members. In turn, our results suggest that resident relocations to mitigate viral spread might have increased the risk of infection for staff members, creating secondary chains of transmission that were responsible for prolonging the outbreak. Our results highlight the importance of considering unnoticed chains of transmission early during an outbreak and making an adequate use and interpretation of diagnostic tests. Outbreak containment measures should be carefully tailored to each LTCF. IMPORTANCE The impact of COVID-19 on long-term care facilities (LTCFs) has been disproportionately large due to the high frailty of the residents. Here, we report epidemiological and genomic findings of a large outbreak that occurred at an LTCF, which ultimately affected almost all residents and nearly half of staff members. We found that the outbreak was initially driven by staff members; however, later resident relocation to limit the outbreak resulted in transmission from residents to staff members, evidencing the complexity and different phases of the outbreak. The phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 isolates indicated that two closely related variants were responsible for the large outbreak. Our study highlights the importance of combining methods of classical and genomic epidemiology to take appropriate outbreak containment measures in LTCFs.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/métodos , Filogenia , Surtos de Doenças , Genômica
7.
Lancet ; 400(10353): 661-669, 2022 08 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35952705

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In May, 2022, several European countries reported autochthonous cases of monkeypox, which rapidly spread globally. Early reports suggest atypical presentations. We aimed to investigate clinical and virological characteristics of cases of human monkeypox in Spain. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study was done in three sexual health clinics in Madrid and Barcelona, Spain. We enrolled all consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed monkeypox from May 11 to June 29, 2022. Participants were offered lesion, anal, and oropharynx swabs for PCR testing. Participant data were collected by means of interviews conducted by dermatologists or specialists in sexually transmitted infections and were recorded using a standard case report form. Outcomes assessed in all participants with a confirmed diagnosis were demographics, smallpox vaccination, HIV status, exposure to someone with monkeypox, travel, mass gathering attendance, risk factors for sexually transmitted infections, sexual behaviour, signs and symptoms on first presentation, virological results at multiple body sites, co-infection with other sexually transmitted pathogens, and clinical outcomes 14 days after the initial presentation. Clinical outcomes were followed up until July 13, 2022. FINDINGS: 181 patients had a confirmed monkeypox diagnosis and were enrolled in the study. 166 (92%) identified as gay men, bisexual men, or other men who have sex with men (MSM) and 15 (8%) identified as heterosexual men or heterosexual women. Median age was 37·0 years (IQR 31·0-42·0). 32 (18%) patients reported previous smallpox vaccination, 72 (40%) were HIV-positive, eight (11%) had a CD4 cell count less than 500 cells per µL, and 31 (17%) were diagnosed with a concurrent sexually transmitted infection. Median incubation was 7·0 days (IQR 5·0-10·0). All participants presented with skin lesions; 141 (78%) participants had lesions in the anogenital region, and 78 (43%) in the oral and perioral region. 70 (39%) participants had complications requiring treatment: 45 (25%) had a proctitis, 19 (10%) had tonsillitis, 15 (8%) had penile oedema, six (3%) an abscess, and eight (4%) had an exanthem. Three (2%) patients required hospital admission. 178 (99%) of 180 swabs from skin lesions collected tested positive, as did 82 (70%) of 117 throat swabs. Viral load was higher in lesion swabs than in pharyngeal specimens (mean cycle threshold value 23 [SD 4] vs 32 [6], absolute difference 9 [95% CI 8-10]; p<0·0001). 108 (65%) of 166 MSM reported anal-receptive sex. MSM who engaged in anal-receptive sex presented with proctitis (41 [38%] of 108 vs four [7%] of 58, absolute difference 31% [95% CI 19-44]; p<0·0001) and systemic symptoms before the rash (67 [62%] vs 16 [28%], absolute difference 34% [28-62]; p<0·0001) more frequently than MSM who did not engage in anal-receptive sex. 18 (95%) of 19 participants with tonsillitis reported practising oral-receptive sex. The median time from onset of lesions to formation of a dry crust was 10 days (IQR 7-13). INTERPRETATION: In our cohort, monkeypox caused genital, perianal, and oral lesions and complications including proctitis and tonsillitis. Because of the variability of presentations, clinicians should have a low threshold for suspicion of monkeypox. Lesion swabs showed the highest viral loads, which, combined with the history of sexual exposure and the distribution of lesions, suggests close contact is probably the dominant transmission route in the current outbreak. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Proctite , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Varíola , Tonsilite , Adulto , Feminino , Homossexualidade Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Vírus da Varíola dos Macacos , Estudos Prospectivos , Comportamento Sexual , Espanha
8.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(4)2022 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35453236

RESUMO

Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance (MLr/FQr) in Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infections is concerning worldwide. Current guidelines recommend performing MLr detection in MG-positive cases to adjust antimicrobial therapy. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of PCR followed by pyrosequencing for MLr detection in comparison with a one-step commercial assay and to assess the prevalence of MLr and FQr in Badalona, Spain. A total of 415 MG-positive samples by Allplex STI-7 (Seegene) were analyzed for MLr detection by pyrosequencing. From those, 179 samples were further analyzed for MG and MLr by ResistancePlus® MG kit (SpeeDx) and 100 of them also for fluoroquinolone resistance (FQr) by sequencing the parC gene. Regarding MG detection, Allplex and Resistance Plus® showed an overall agreement of 87%, but this value rose to 95.4% if we compare them for MLr detection. Prevalence of MLr was 23.1% in Badalona, but this rate increased to 73.7% in the HIV-positive patients cohort. FQr detection showed 3% of resistant strains. Pyrosequencing is a convenient and cheap technique for MLr detection, but one-step tools should be considered in high-throughput laboratories. Despite the fact that MLr remained moderate and FQr was low in our study, simultaneous MG and MLr detection would improve patient's management applying resistance-guided treatment strategies.

9.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260397, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855801

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Influenza vaccination rates in risk groups remain suboptimal. Evidence supporting a significant association between influenza vaccination and severe illness is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of out- and inpatients with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection attended during the 2018-19 epidemic season. Influenza vaccination coverage by indication was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of vaccination between severe and non-severe influenza-positive patients. Severe cases were defined as presenting pneumonia, admission to critical care units and/or death. RESULTS: The overall vaccination coverage among influenza-positive patients was 30.4%. In subjects with ≥ 1 indication for vaccination, the vaccination coverage was 42.4%. By indication, coverage rates were: 52.5% in patients aged ≥ 59 years, 42.2% in obese patients, 29.2% in immunosuppressed subjects and 6.5% in pregnant women. In patients with underlying chronic diseases, a higher coverage was found in patients with cognitive impairment (77%), muscular dystrophy (63.6%) and renal disease (60.4%). The multivariate logistic regression model showed severe influenza-related illness was associated with a lack of influenza vaccination before seeking care during the 2018-2019 season [0.59 (95%CI 0.36-0.97); p = 0.038], older age [1.01 (95%CI 1.00-1.02); p = 0.009] and current or former smoking status [1.63 (95%CI 0.84-3.18) and 2.03 (95%CI 1.16-3.57); p = 0.031], adjusted by underlying disease. CONCLUSION: Adjusting by age, smoking status and underlying disease, a moderate association between the influenza vaccine and severe laboratory-confirmed influenza-related illness was found in an epidemic season in which there was matching between the vaccine and circulating strains. Protection against complications, especially in older subjects and in those with underlying disease is postulated as one of the strengths of annual influenza vaccination. However, influenza vaccination is a pending issue in these groups, especially in pregnant women and obese people. To avoid suboptimal vaccination coverages, health professionals should recommend the seasonal influenza vaccination according to the annual instructions of the health authorities.


Assuntos
Cobertura Vacinal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estações do Ano , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
11.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(10): 1365-1372, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051886

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The banning of mass-gathering indoor events to prevent SARS-CoV-2 spread has had an important effect on local economies. Despite growing evidence on the suitability of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for mass screening at the event entry, this strategy has not been assessed under controlled conditions. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a prevention strategy during a live indoor concert. METHODS: We designed a randomised controlled open-label trial to assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive preventive intervention for a mass-gathering indoor event (a live concert) based on systematic same-day screening of attendees with Ag-RDTs, use of facial masks, and adequate air ventilation. The event took place in the Sala Apolo, Barcelona, Spain. Adults aged 18-59 years with a negative result in an Ag-RDT from a nasopharyngeal swab collected immediately before entering the event were randomised 1:1 (block randomisation stratified by age and gender) to either attend the indoor event for 5 hours or go home. Nasopharyngeal specimens used for Ag-RDT screening were analysed by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and cell culture (Vero E6 cells). 8 days after the event, a nasopharyngeal swab was collected and analysed by Ag-RDT, RT-PCR, and a transcription-mediated amplification test (TMA). The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at 8 days between the control and the intervention groups, assessed in all participants who were randomly assigned, attended the event, and had a valid result for the SARS-CoV-2 test done at follow-up. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04668625. FINDINGS: Participant enrollment took place during the morning of the day of the concert, Dec 12, 2020. Of the 1140 people who responded to the call and were deemed eligible, 1047 were randomly assigned to either enter the music event (experimental group) or continue with normal life (control group). Of the 523 randomly assigned to the experimental group, 465 were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (51 did not enter the event and eight did not take part in the follow-up assessment), and of the 524 randomly assigned to the control group, 495 were included in the final analysis (29 did not take part in the follow-up). At baseline, 15 (3%) of 495 individuals in the control group and 13 (3%) of 465 in the experimental group tested positive on TMA despite a negative Ag-RDT result. The RT-PCR test was positive in one case in each group and cell viral culture was negative in all cases. 8 days after the event, two (<1%) individuals in the control arm had a positive Ag-RDT and PCR result, whereas no Ag-RDT nor RT-PCR positive results were found in the intervention arm. The Bayesian estimate for the incidence between the experimental and control groups was -0·15% (95% CI -0·72 to 0·44). INTERPRETATION: Our study provides preliminary evidence on the safety of indoor mass-gathering events during a COVID-19 outbreak under a comprehensive preventive intervention. The data could help restart cultural activities halted during COVID-19, which might have important sociocultural and economic implications. FUNDING: Primavera Sound Group and the #YoMeCorono Initiative. TRANSLATION: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Teste Sorológico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
12.
Front Public Health ; 9: 788581, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35071169

RESUMO

Background: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen (Ag) tests have been widely employed to identify patients for a rapid diagnosis and pandemic control. Rapid lateral-flow techniques are currently the most used, but automated technologies have emerged as another viable alternative to molecular methods. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 Ag test in asymptomatic population and close contacts, for its use as a tool in pandemic control efforts. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 861 samples were included, 291 (34%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 with cycle threshold (Ct) <40, and 570 (66%) were negative. Results: A strong correlation was observed between reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) Ct and Ag 50% Tissue Culture Infectious Dose per milliliter (TCID50/ml; r = 0.6486; p < 0.0001) and all RT-PCR negative samples tested negative for the 200 TCID50/ml SARS-Cov-2 Ag cutoff, i.e., a specificity of 100% was reached (95% CI: 99.4-100.0%). Samples with <25 Ct and/or >106 extrapolated copies/ml were reached a sensitivity of 100% (95% IC 97.0-100.0%). For intermediate viral loads (>105 extrapolated copies/ml or <30 Ct), the sensitivity value still exceeded 80%. As with other Ag methods, samples between 30 and 40 Ct could not be detected with a reliable sensitivity. Conclusions: The LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay displays an acceptable sensitivity and a very high specificity that is useful for detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal swabs (NPS) of asymptomatic population or to regular monitoring of risk groups in controlled settings. Additionally, the flexibility in processing different samples and in the sampling preparation process makes this test an option for its use in high throughput laboratories. Automated tests may facilitate result reporting and yield consistent data, while avoiding some of the pitfalls of rapid lateral-flow techniques, such as observer variability.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
13.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 155(3): 112-118, ago. 2020. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-195751

RESUMO

OBJETIVOS: El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de la vacunación antigripal en la prevención de casos graves asociados a gripe en pacientes adultos atendidos en un hospital de tercer nivel durante la temporada epidémica 2017-2018. METODOLOGÍA: Se realizó un análisis descriptivo con toda la población de sujetos con gripe confirmada por laboratorio en la temporada 2017-2018. Se definió caso grave como el ingreso en unidades de críticos o muerte. El efecto de la vacuna en la población adulta se determinó mediante análisis de regresión logística multivariante. RESULTADOS: Entre las semanas epidemiológicas 44/2017 y 19/2018, el laboratorio del hospital detectó 706 muestras positivas de virus influenza. De los 551 pacientes confirmados de 18 años o más, cuarenta y tres fueron ingresados en alguna de las unidades de críticos del hospital y 26 fallecieron durante el ingreso. El modelo multivariante explicativo mostró la vacunación de la gripe durante la temporada de estudio como factor protector del desarrollo de gravedad [OR: 0,27 (0,11-0,65), p = 0,004], ajustada por edad [1,03 (1,01-1,06), p = 0,04], sexo, tipo de virus (H1N1-pdm09, H3N2 o B) y el estar clasificado como Paciente Crónico Complejo o Enfermedad Avanzada Crónica. CONCLUSIONES: La vacuna de la gripe se muestra como factor protector frente al desarrollo de complicaciones en una temporada en la que la vacuna no contiene el virus que más ha circulado entre la población. Se debe recomendar la vacuna antigripal con periodicidad anual a los grupos de riesgo establecidos por las autoridades sanitarias


OBJECTIVES: The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccination on the prevention of influenza-related severe cases in adults treated in a third-level hospital during the 2017-2018 epidemic season. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive analysis was performed on the entire population of subjects with a laboratory-confirmed influenza test during the 2017-2018 season. A severe case was defined as a patient treated in one of the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and/or death. The effect of the vaccine on the adult population was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Between epidemiological weeks 44/2017 and 19/2018, the hospital's laboratory detected 706 positive samples for influenza virus. Of the 551 confirmed patients aged 18 years or older, forty-three were admitted to one of the ICUs, and 26 died during admission. The explanatory multivariate model has shown that flu vaccination prior to or during the epidemic season was a protective factor for the development of severity [OR:0.27 (0.11-0.65, p = 0.004)], adjusted by age [OR: 1.03 (1.01-1.06), p=.04], sex, type of virus (H1N1-pdm09, H3N2 or B virus), Chronic Complex Patient index or Advanced Chronic Disease index. Conclussions: Influenza vaccination is a protective factor against the development of severity associated with influenza infection in a season when vaccination did not contain the virus with higher epidemic circulation among the population. Flu vaccination should be recommended annually following the guidelines established by the health authorities


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação , Influenza Humana/microbiologia , Análise Multivariada
14.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 155(3): 112-118, 2020 08 14.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32423688

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccination on the prevention of influenza-related severe cases in adults treated in a third-level hospital during the 2017-2018 epidemic season. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive analysis was performed on the entire population of subjects with a laboratory-confirmed influenza test during the 2017-2018 season. A severe case was defined as a patient treated in one of the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and/or death. The effect of the vaccine on the adult population was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Between epidemiological weeks 44/2017 and 19/2018, the hospital's laboratory detected 706 positive samples for influenza virus. Of the 551 confirmed patients aged 18 years or older, forty-three were admitted to one of the ICUs, and 26 died during admission. The explanatory multivariate model has shown that flu vaccination prior to or during the epidemic season was a protective factor for the development of severity [OR:0.27 (0.11-0.65, p=0.004)], adjusted by age [OR: 1.03 (1.01-1.06), p=.04], sex, type of virus (H1N1-pdm09, H3N2 or B virus), Chronic Complex Patient index or Advanced Chronic Disease index. CONCLUSSIONS: Influenza vaccination is a protective factor against the development of severity associated with influenza infection in a season when vaccination did not contain the virus with higher epidemic circulation among the population. Flu vaccination should be recommended annually following the guidelines established by the health authorities.


Assuntos
Epidemias , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hospitais , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estações do Ano , Vacinação
15.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(9): 574-577, nov. 2017. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-168884

RESUMO

Introducción: La mayoría de laboratorios de microbiología utilizan diferentes técnicas para el diagnóstico de las infecciones gastrointestinales. Algunas requieren hasta 72 h para obtener resultados definitivos. Material y métodos: El panel gastrointestinal de Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canadá) se trata de un ensayo cualitativo multiplex rápido y sensible capaz de detectar e identificar simultáneamente los 15 patógenos más frecuentes causantes de gastroenteritis. Nuestro objetivo ha sido evaluar este panel multiplex comparándolo con los métodos habituales empleados en nuestro laboratorio. Resultados: Se analizaron 225 muestras de heces. A través de los métodos convencionales fueron 74 las muestras positivas (32,9%). A través de Luminex fueron 137 las muestras positivas (60,9%). Conclusión: El uso del panel gastrointestinal de Luminex puede mejorar el diagnóstico de las infecciones gastrointestinales principalmente porque proporciona resultados en menos de 8 h. Determinados microorganismos deben interpretarse con precaución y basándose en datos clínicos y epidemiológicos del paciente (AU)


Introduction: Most Microbiology laboratories use different techniques for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections. Some of which require at least 72 hours to obtain final results. Material and Methods: The gastrointestinal panel Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canada) is a qualitative multiplex fast and sensitive assay able to detect and to identify the 15 most common pathogens causing gastrointestinal infection simultaneously. We evaluated this multiplex panel comparing it with conventional methods used in our laboratory. Results: We analyzed 225 samples of feces. Through the conventional methods were positive 74 samples (32.9%). Through the Luminex method were positive 137 samples (60.9%). Conclusions: The use of the xTAG(R) GPP system in Clinical Microbiology can improve the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infectious because it provides results in less than 8 hours. Some pathogens should be applied with caution and should be interpreted based on the patients clinical data (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Enteropatias/microbiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/instrumentação , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Enteropatias Parasitárias/microbiologia
16.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(9): 574-577, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27059749

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Most Microbiology laboratories use different techniques for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections. Some of which require at least 72 hours to obtain final results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The gastrointestinal panel Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canada) is a qualitative multiplex fast and sensitive assay able to detect and to identify the 15 most common pathogens causing gastrointestinal infection simultaneously. We evaluated this multiplex panel comparing it with conventional methods used in our laboratory. RESULTS: We analyzed 225 samples of feces. Through the conventional methods were positive 74 samples (32.9%). Through the Luminex method were positive 137 samples (60.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the xTAG® GPP system in Clinical Microbiology can improve the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infectious because it provides results in less than 8 hours. Some pathogens should be applied with caution and should be interpreted based on the patient́s clinical data.


Assuntos
Diarreia/microbiologia , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/microbiologia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Doença Aguda , Diarreia/etiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Gastroenteropatias/complicações , Humanos , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...